Page Information

    Page: Issue #11: Suggest new text for 5.6 Calculate Weights
    Page: Issue #12: Suggested new text for 5.7 Calculate aggregates
    Page: Issue #13: Suggested new text for 5.8 Finalise data files
    Page: Issue #14: Suggested new text for 2.3 Design collection
    Page: Issue #15: Assemble or Build
    Page: Issue #16: Proposal for additional text in 4.1 and in 4.3
    Page: Issue #17: Proposal to change text descriptions of Phase 5 Process and 5.1 Integrate data
    Page: Issue #18: Proposal to change the name of 5.5: Derive new variables and units
    Page: Issue #19: Things that came up at the Workshop on Implementing Standards for Statistical Modernisation (21–23 September 2016)
    Page: Issue #20: Is there any feedback from MEMOBUST?
    Page: Issue #21: Version 6...?
    Page: Issue #22: Metadata Management - GSBPM and GAMSO
    Page: Issue #23: GSBPM and GAMSO
    Page: Issue #24: Comment on sub-process 2.2
    Page: Issue #25: Quality - where does it go?
    Page: Issue #26: Comment on sub-process 1.3
    Page: Issue #27: Geospatial components in GSBPM
    Page: Issue #28: Levels of detail in GSBPM
    Page: Issue #29: Legal aspects in GSBPM
    Page: Issue #30: Comment on 1.6 Prepare business case
    Page: Issue #31: Comment on para 113 of GSBPM
    Page: Issue #32: Definition of quality requirements
    Page: Issue #33: Comment on the first phase
    Page: Issue #34 Merge of sub-processes 1.1-1.3
    Page: Issue #35: Split sub-process 4.3 Run Collection into separate collection processes
    Page: Issue #36: Define more precise boundary between Phase 4 (Collection) and Sub-process 5.1 (Integrate data)
    Page: Issue #37: Data editing precedes sub-process 5.3 (review & validate)
    Page: Issue #38: Update outgoing url
    Page: Issue #39: Change visual representation of GSBPM to make it look less linear
    Page: Issue #40: Add annex of GSBPM adaptations (e.g. national accounts)
    Page: Issue #41: On data integration (sub-process 5.1)
    Page: Issue #42: To provide some guidance on link between GSBPM and GSIM
    Page: Issue #43: Imbalance in terms of tasks across sub-processes
    Page: Issue #44: GSBPM is too survey collection oriented
    Page: Issue #45: Interfaces between statistical production and corporate
    Page: Issue #46: Integrated tasks can be classified in different phases depending on point of view
    Page: Issue #47: Additional documentation specifying which tasks are included in which subprocess of GSBPM
    Page: Issue #48: Better alignment in terminologies
    Page: Issue #49: GSBPM when final product is a register
    Page: Issue #50: GSBPM is a capability model rather than a process model
    Page: Issue #51: Analyse Phase is too output-oriented
    Page: Issue #52: Does the model address the need to get full value from data?
    Page: Issue #53: GSBPM does not reflect an architectural phase
    Page: Issue #54: External data collection by data suppliers
    Page: Issue #55: Need to monitor changes in processing completed by data supplier
    Page: Issue #56: To incorporate commercial/open/big data
    Page: Issue #57: GSBPM does not reflect the National Accounts statistical process
    Page: Issue #58: Statistical Methods need abstracting
    Page: Issue #59: To add specification of weighting data
    Page: Issue #60: To add more details about management of business register in GSBPM or GAMSO
    Page: Issue #61: Description of non-survey source is generic in sub-process 4.2
    Page: Issue #62: Alignment with SIMS and ESS EA
    Page: Issue #63: Comment on sub-process 5.7-6.2
    Page: Issue #64: Suggestion to distinguish sub-processes 3.4 and 3.5
    Page: Issue #65: Suggestion from QI GSBPM group
    Page: Issue #66: More detail on analysis
    Page: Issue #67: More text on processes starting with aggregate data
    Page: Issue #68: Hard to separate Collect phase and Process phase
    Page: Issue #69: to organize use-cases in wiki by aim/topics/maturity
    Page: Issue #70: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 2.3 Design collection
    Page: Issue #71: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 2.5 Design processing and analysis
    Page: Issue #72: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 4.2 Set up collection
    Page: Issue #73: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 4.3 Run collection
    Page: Issue #74: comments on phase 8 intro description
    Page: Issue #75: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 8.1 Gather evaluation inputs
    Page: Issue #76: Suggestion to add text in sub-process 8.2 Conduct evaluation
    Page: Issue #77: Evaluation should be conducted against a benchmark
    Page: Issue #78: revision policy is absent
    Page: Issue #79: Seasonal adjustment to be emphasized in 6.1
    Page: Issue #80: reference to procedures of weight correction for benchmarking indicators could be placed in 5.6
    Page: Better reflect the importance of strategic partnerships
    Page: Question about 6.5 finalise output
    Page: Black and white version of level 1&2 diagram
    Page: Feedback from Supporting Standards task teams for GSBPM revision
    Page: Comment on texts in GSBPM 5.1
    Page: Agil methods and the GSBPM methodology
    Page: Suggestions for GSBPM revision
    Page: Issue #2-1: Version number
    Page: Issue #2-2: Alignment with GSIM
    Page: Issue #2-3: Reference to GAMSO
    Page: Issue #2-4: Definition of “Business Process”
    Page: Issue #2-5: Paragraph 13
    Page: Issue #2-6: Paragraph 23
    Page: Issue #2-7: Paragraph 34
    Page: Issue #2-8: Sub-process 2.5-2.6
    Page: Issue #2-9: Paragraph 56
    Page: Issue #2-10: Sub-process 3.1-3.3
    Page: Issue #2-11: Paragraph 58
    Page: Issue #2-12: Sub-process 3.5
    Page: Issue #2-13: Sub-process 3.6
    Page: Issue #2-14: Paragraph 73
    Page: Issue #2-15: Phase “Evaluate”