(Feedback from Italy)

Can it be more appropriate to rename the composition relationship between "Referential Metadata Structure" and "Referential Metadata Subject Item", from "contains" in "refers to"?


  • No labels

5 Comments

  1. Jenny Linnerud

    Do we have to be consistent/compliant with SDMX_IM? I tried to check that, but the nearest I came to was looking at Clickable SDMX Home and Detailed Diagrams.

    Maybe someone who is more familiar With SDMX_IM can help us to check this one?

  2. InKyung Choi

    GSIM Sprint (24 Jan.)

    To change the relation as proposed. Guillaume Duffes to double check if this is used that way indeed. 

  3. InKyung Choi

    Mauro Scanu - was it these composition relations that are re-named from "contains: to "refers to"? 

  4. Jenny Linnerud

    In retrospect this is very unclear.

    Is it possible to go back to the orginal feedback from Italy to see what information objects, associations and texts on associations this issue is actually referring to? 

  5. InKyung Choi

    Sorry, it was about Referential Metadata Set and Referential Metadata Subject Item only, "Referential Metadata Set refers to Referential Metadata Subject Item".

    Mauro Scanu What would be the cardinality? 1..1?