Comprehensive and other presentationsOrganizers: Steering Committee |
|
|
| Paper | Presentation |
|
|
| Abstract | Presentation |
Session 1: Access to microdataSession Organizers: Aleksandra Bujnowska (Eurostat), Janika Tarkoma (Statistics Finland) and Steven Thomas (Statistics Canada) Session 1.1: Microdata access facilities | | 1 | Romania NIS – Microdata for scientific purposes. Lucian Alexandrescu (National Institute of Statistics of Romania) | Paper | Presentation | | 2 | Joint Safe Center at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Beata Dobanyne Nagy, Eszter Regos (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) | Paper | Presentation | | 3 | Access to microdata in the State Statistical Office of the Republic of North Macedonia. Mirjana Bosnjak, Slobodan Malevski (State Statistical Office of the Republic of North Macedonia) | Paper | Presentation | | 4 | A more flexible approach to access Statistics Canada microdata. Kelly Cranswick (Statistics Canada) | Paper | Presentation | | 5 | Interoperability Challenges in Access to Microdata. Natalia Volkow (INEGI) | Paper | Presentation | | 6 | Data Confidentiality in ICBS Research Rooms. Julia Vider (CBS, Israel) |
| Presentation |
Session 3: Risk assessmentSession Organizers: : Josep Domingo-Ferrer (Universitat Rovira i Virgili), Krish Muralidhar (University of Oklahoma) | | 1 | Optimising the Trade-off between Information Utility and Disclosure Risk in a GA Synthetic Data Generator. Yingrui Chen, Jennifer Taub, Mark Elliot (University of Manchester) | Paper | Presentation | | 2 | 10 is the safest number that there’s ever been. Felix Ritchie (University of the West of England) | Paper | Presentation | | 3 | The Synthetic Data Challenge. Mark Elliot and Jennifer Taub (University of Manchester) | Paper | Presentation | | 4 | Connecting privacy models and statistical disclosure control methods through bistochastic anonymization. Krish Muralidhar (U.Oklahoma), Nicolas Ruiz (OECD), Josep Domingo-Ferrer (URV) | Paper | Presentation | | 5 | What is the difference. Krish Muralidhar (University of Oklahoma), Rathindra Sarathy (Oklahoma State University) | Paper | Presentation |
Session 6: Confidentiality issues of the Census 2020/2021 roundSession Organizers: Eric Schulte Nordholt (Statistics Netherlands) | | 1 | A framework for assessing perturbative methods for protection of Census 2021 data at Statistics Portugal. Ines Rodrigues, Paula Campos and Teresa Fragoso (Statistics Portugal) | Paper | Presentation | | 2 | Rosstat | Paper | Presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
Session 2: Tabular dataSession Organizers: Sarah Giessing (Destatis) | | 1 | Draft concepts for generalising tools implementing the cell key method to the case of continuous variables. Sarah Giessing and Reinhard Tent (Destatis) | Paper | Presentation | | 2 | Prodcom disclosure control with non-nested national and european classification. Maël Buron (Insee) | Paper | Presentation | | 3 | Computational experience with stabilized Benders for the cell suppression problem. Daniel Baena, Jordi Castro and Antonio Frangioni (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya) | Paper | Presentation | | 4 | Releasable inner cell frequencies by post-processing protected tabular data. Øyvind Langsrud (Statistics Norway) | Paper | Presentation | | 5 | Primary analysis of disclosure risk in tabular data from a Brazilian economic survey. Samela Batista Arantes and Maysa S. de Magalhaes (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) |
| Presentation | | 6 | Algorithmic Matching Attacks on Optimally Suppresses Tabular Data. Japan Institute of Statistics |
|
|
Session 1.2: Microdata protectionSession Organizer: Aleksandra Bujnowska (Eurostat), Janika Tarkoma (Statistics Finland) and Steven Thomas (Statistics Canada) | | 1 | Promoting Statistical Disclosure Control for novices: A Handbook. Richard Welpton (The Health Foundation), Arne Wolters (The Health Foundation), Emily Griffiths (University of Manchester), James Scott (University of Essex), Christine Woods (University of Essex) |
|
| | 2 | Access to microdata: Case of household surveys in Bosnia and Herzegovina-current practice and further development. Edin Šabanović (Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina) |
|
| | 3 | Synthetic data generation for anonymization purposes. Application on the Norwegian Survey on living conditions/EHIS. Johan Heldal and Diana-Cristina Iancu (Statistics Norway) |
|
| | 4 | A practice guide for microdata anonymization. Thijs Benschop and Matthew Welch (World Bank) |
|
| | 5 | Training research output checkers. Felix Ritchie (University of the West of England) |
|
| | 6 | Creation of synthetic microdata using dummy random variables of high dimension statistics based on big data. Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 5: Framework for confidentialitySession Organizer: Aleksandra Bujnowska (Eurostat), Janika Tarkoma (Statistics Finland) | | 1 | Understanding personalities in data access decision-making. Richard Welpton (The Health Foundation) |
|
| | 2 | Successes and Challenges in Increasing Accessibility at Statistics Canada. Steven Thomas (Statistics Canada) |
|
| | 3 | Evaluation criteria for the selection of the SDC Method. Christiane Seifert, Johannes Rohde (IT.NRW) and Sarah Giessing (Destatis) |
|
| | 4 | Crisis management – training, practicing and testing. Janika Tarkoma and Harri Koskinen (Statistics Finland) |
|
| | 5 | Statistical confidentiality in the range of measures safeguarding privacy of data subjects. Aleksandra Bujnowska (Eurostat) |
|
|
Session 4: Emerging issuesSession Organizer: Josep Domingo-Ferrer (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) | | 1 | Comparing methods of safely plotting variables on a map. Y. (Sapphire) Han, Peter-Paul de Wolf and Edwin de Jonge (Statistics Netherlands) |
|
| | 2 | Private Set Intersection with Analytics. Guiseppe Bruno and Diana Nicoletti (Bank of Italy), Monica Scannapieco and Diego Zardetto (Istat) |
|
| | 3 | The Potential of Anonymization Methods for Creating Detailed Geographical Data in Japan. Shinsuke Ito and Masayuki Terada (Chuo University) |
|
| | 4 | Protecting consumer privacy in smart metering by randomized response. Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Bastian Stolb, David Sanchez (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) |
|
| | 5 | Challenges and experiences in anonymizing and disseminating microdata from agricultural surveys in the context of the FAO AGRISurvey program. Thijs Benschop, Clara Aida Khalil (FAO) |
|
|
Session 7: Software tools for statistical data confidentialitySession Organizer: Peter-Paul de Wolf (Statistics Netherlands) | | 1 | cellKey - consistent perturbation of statistical tables. Bernhard Meindl (Statistics Austria) and Tobias Enderle (Destatis) |
|
| | 2 | Microdata.no - Instant Access to Microdata. Johan Heldal, Svein Johansen, Ørnulf Risnes (Statistics Norway) |
|
|
Link to Workshop's page on the UNECE website |