In the ABS future model, system workflows will be assembled and released 'to order', potentially in a 'plug and play' way, from a library of shared interchangeable services, rather than building individual systems for each collection or family of collections. Using the 'term' called 'Assemble' for this phase instead of 'Build' would help in changing the culture towards assembly from re-usable components. This change would also help orient the GSBPM towards supporting the CSPA's 'plug and play' initiative, and modernization more generally, while not precluding statistical organizations who don't have an architecture oriented toward reusable components, and therefore need to build more of the components that they will then assemble.
Please indicate your support for this change using the stars and legend below
5* (We should do this)
4* (Good idea, but need to discuss)
3* (I am not sure, we need to discuss)
2* (Should not make the change, but need to discuss)