96. A Correspondence Table expresses the relationship between two Statistical Classifications. These relationships show how the items of the source/predecessor Statistical Classification relate to the items of the target/successor Statistical Classification. The typology presented in this appendix provides a systematic way to classify the various types of relationships, and thus enables to enrich the information held in Correspondence Tables.
97. Before presenting the typology, we have to make clear what we understand by "change of a Classification Item".
99. From these three components, the definition represents the essence of the category best, more than the name and the code. Therefore, we will consider the meaning of a category to be represented by its definition, especially its denotation.
100. Ideally, naming, coding and definition ought to behave consistently, while the definition is "leading", in the sense that a change of definition
Note that not all changes in (the wording of) definitions imply changes in meaning. Indeed, changes which "merely" intend to enhance the clarity of a definition, or to further operationalise a definition on the basis of situations encountered in practice, do not affect the meaning of an item. The same goes for extending a Classification Index or case law.
101. The figures show the relationships between Classification Items involved in the change from the old (left) to the new (right) Statistical Classification. Blocks denote Classification Items. Classification Items are identified by their code. A block that keeps its colour keeps its code. The various changes are expressed in terms of events.
A.1. Deletion (1 : 0)
A Classification Item expires, while its denotation reduces to zero; it does not proceed as (part of the) denotation of one or more other (existing) Classification Items.
A.2 Creation (0 : 1)
The mirror image of deletion: a Classification Item emerges, while its denotation is not (part of) the denotation of one or more existing Classification Items.
A.3 COMBINATION (N:1)
Two or more Classification Items expire, while their denotations proceed in one emerging Classification Item.
A.3.2 TAKE-OVER (N: 1)
A Classification Item expires, while its denotation proceeds as part of the denotation of another Classification Item, which continues its existence.
A.4 Decomposition (1: N)
The mirror image of merger: a Classification Item expires, while its denotation is distributed over and proceeds in two or more emerging Classification Items.
A.4.2 SPLIT OFF
The mirror image of take-over: a Classification Item continues to exist, while part of its denotation moves to another (emerging) Classification Item.
A.5 Transfer (M : N
Part of the denotation of a Classification Item moves to another (existing) Classification Item
- The situation pictured is the most simple of a number of situations, in which more Classification Items may be involved in the relationship between the old and new structure.
- "Transfer" can also be applied at higher Levels of a Statistical Classification. In such cases the part of the denotation that moves (to another (existing) Classification Item) corresponds to a Classification Item at the lower Level:
B. 1 CODE CHANGE
Strictly speaking, this heading is not correct, because different codes denote different Classification Items.
(1: 0 ; 0 : 1)
A Classification Item expires, while its denotation proceeds as the denotation of an emerging Classification Item.
B.2 NAME CHANGE (1 : 1)
The name of a Classification Item changes, while its denotation remains the same.
103. Deletion and creation may result in border changes. Combination, decomposition and transfer do result in border changes. Code change and name change do not result in border changes.