(Feedback from Edgardo Greising, 10 Dec., 2017)

* Suggestion underlined

102.  Evaluation material can be produced in any other phase or sub-process. It may take many forms, including feedback from users, process metadata (paradata), system metrics, and staff suggestions. Reports of progress against an action plan agreed during a previous iteration may also form an input to evaluations of subsequent iterations. This sub-process gathers all of these inputs, compile derived indicators and makes them available for the person or team producing the evaluation. The collection of some of these evaluation materials can be automated and take place in a continuous way throughout the whole process, as defined by the quality framework (see Quality Management in VI. Over-arching processes). However, not all data from the monitoring system will necessary be made available to the evaluators. On the other hand, for the evaluation of certain processes it can be necessary to perform specific activities like small surveys e.g. coverage assessment or effectiveness of dissemination.

  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. user-8e470

    Meeting 15/5: Agree with change. Wording will be reviewed by Marina Signore