Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata


GSBPM 5.0 is under review right now and final proposal for revised GSBPM is expected in June, 2018. 

For the overview of the issues under discussion, see: https://statswiki.unece.org/x/NYEuCQ 

 

Comments or questions about the GSBPM? Ideas for revision? Experiences to share? 

Use this discussion forum to share your thoughts.

You need to be logged in to participate in the forum.  To request a username and password contact support.stat@unece.org

 

Show Advanced Filters

Status

Topic

Author

# of Replies

Last Activity Date

 


 

  • No labels
Page: Issue #1: Proposal to add design of communication strategy to phase 2 Page: Issue #2: Classification Page: Issue #3: Metadata and Quality Management - Overarching GSBPM area versus separate GAMSO area Page: Issue #4: Over-arching processes Page: Issue #5: Mapping GSBPM Overarching processes to GAMSO (from Franck Cotton) Page: Issue #6: Minor changes to text Page: Issue #7: Synergies with other Modernisation Standards Page: Issue #8: Changes to text descriptions to better reflect admin data use within GSBPM Page: Issue #9: 5.5. Derive new variables and units Page: Issue #10: Clickable GSBPM? Page: Issue #11: Suggest new text for 5.6 Calculate Weights Page: Issue #12: Suggested new text for 5.7 Calculate aggregates Page: Issue #13: Suggested new text for 5.8 Finalise data files Page: Issue #14: Suggested new text for 2.3 Design collection Page: Issue #15: Assemble or Build Page: Issue #16: Proposal for additional text in 4.1 and in 4.3 Page: Issue #17: Proposal to change text descriptions of Phase 5 Process and 5.1 Integrate data Page: Issue #18: Proposal to change the name of 5.5: Derive new variables and units Page: Issue #19: Things that came up at the Workshop on Implementing Standards for Statistical Modernisation (21–23 September 2016) Page: Issue #20: Is there any feedback from MEMOBUST? Page: Issue #21: Version 6...? Page: Issue #22: Metadata Management - GSBPM and GAMSO Page: Issue #23: GSBPM and GAMSO Page: Issue #24: Comment on sub-process 2.2 Page: Issue #25: Quality - where does it go? Page: Issue #26: Comment on sub-process 1.3 Page: Issue #27: Geospatial components in GSBPM Page: Issue #28: Levels of detail in GSBPM Page: Issue #29: Legal aspects in GSBPM Page: Issue #30: Comment on 1.6 Prepare business case Page: Issue #31: Comment on para 113 of GSBPM Page: Issue #32: Definition of quality requirements Page: Issue #33: Comment on the first phase Page: Issue #34 Merge of sub-processes 1.1-1.3 Page: Issue #35: Split sub-process 4.3 Run Collection into separate collection processes Page: Issue #36: Define more precise boundary between Phase 4 (Collection) and Sub-process 5.1 (Integrate data) Page: Issue #37: Data editing precedes sub-process 5.3 (review & validate) Page: Issue #38: Update outgoing url Page: Issue #39: Change visual representation of GSBPM to make it look less linear Page: Issue #40: Add annex of GSBPM adaptations (e.g. national accounts) Page: Issue #41: On data integration (sub-process 5.1) Page: Issue #42: To provide some guidance on link between GSBPM and GSIM Page: Issue #43: Imbalance in terms of tasks across sub-processes (Phase 2 and Phase 3) Page: Issue #44: GSBPM is too survey collection oriented Page: Issue #45: Interfaces between statistical production and corporate Page: Issue #46: Integrated tasks can be classified in different phases depending on point of view Page: Issue #47: Additional documentation specifying which tasks are included in which subprocess of GSBPM Page: Issue #48: Better alignment in terminologies Page: Issue #49: GSBPM when final product is a register Page: Issue #50: GSBPM is a capability model rather than a process model Page: Issue #51: Analyse Phase is too output-oriented Page: Issue #52: Does the model address the need to get full value from data? Page: Issue #53: GSBPM does not reflect an architectural phase Page: Issue #54: External data collection by data suppliers Page: Issue #55: Need to monitor changes in processing completed by data supplier Page: Issue #56: To incorporate commercial/open/big data Page: Issue #57: GSBPM does not reflect the National Accounts statistical process Page: Issue #58: Statistical Methods need abstracting Page: Issue #59: To add specification of weighting data Page: Issue #60: To add more details about management of business register in GSBPM or GAMSO Page: Issue #61: Description of non-survey source is generic in sub-process 4.2 Page: Issue #62: Alignment with SIMS and ESS EA Page: Issue #63: Comment on sub-process 5.7-6.2 Page: Issue #64: Suggestion to distinguish sub-processes 3.4 and 3.5